Dipyridamole does not have any additive effect on the prevention of COVID-19 coagulopathy

Objective: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus 2 (SaRS-Cov-2) associated respiratory disease (COVID-19), announced as a pandemic, is a multisystem syndrome. SARS-CoV-2 directly infects and damages vascular endothelial cells, which leads to microvascular dysfunction and promotes a procoagulant state. Dipyridamole (DP) acts as a reversible phosphodiesterase inhibitor and is used mainly as an antiplatelet agent. It is hypothetised that it has possible activities in COVID-19. Design and Methodology: We report our retrospective, real-world results of DP added to low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the treatment of 462 clinically diagnosed and hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We compared anticoagulation with and without DP addition with no administration of anticoagulation in the same time frame. The primary outcome was proven or highly suspected coagulopathy within 30 days of hospitalization. Results: Definitive coagulopathy has been diagnosed in 3 (3.5%) of 85 LMWH administered patients and 7 (2.13%) of 328 DP + LMWH received patients (P=0.456). Five cases with definitive coagulopathy were not initiated any anticoagulation at the time of the event. The multivariate analysis showed that DP addition to the anticoagulant approach did not have any impact on the risk of demonstrated coagulopathy and highly-suspected coagulopathy. Conclusion: We think that our clinical experience is valuable in showing the real-life results of DP + LMWH treatment in COVID-19. This approach did not affect the coagulopathy rate. Our data did also not document an additive effect of DP in the COVID-19 outcome. Prospective controlled trials would give more convincing results regarding the role of DP in COVID-19 endothelial dysfunction and clinical outcome.

Cross-talk between the Inflammatory Response and Coagulopathy: Single-center Report

Background : Covid-19 appeared quaint with evolving hyperinflammation phase, vasculoendothelial dysfunction, and a distinct coagulopathy. Aims : We present our experience regarding coagulopathy predictive factors in hospitalized Covid-19 patients just after pandemic declaration. Methods : The data were obtained retrospectively by screening the institution's electronic data system between March and May 2020. The treatment protocol based on Health Ministry guidelines, includes hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, favipiravir, low-molecular-weight heparin, dipyridamole, and anti-cytokine agents on the hyperinflammation phase. We stratified 3 groups, patients with proven coagulopathy, highly suspected coagulopathy, and patients without coagulopathy. Highly suspected coagulopathy encompasses clinical deterioration with sudden and inconsistent D-dimer elevation. Results : A total of 511 patients were screened. Forty-nine of them were excluded due to accompanying conditions resulting in high D-dimer levels. The median age of the remaining patients was 56 years with a male/female ratio of 284/178. Proven coagulopathy as documented thrombosis developed in 3.2% with a male predominance (60%). Highly suspected coagulopathy was decided in 10.1% of patients. Among predictive factors for coagulopathy, the risk factors at admission were being over 65-year-old, having coronary artery disease, dyspnea, severe lymphopenia (<500/μl), monocytopenia (<300/ μl), and elevated LDH. For highly suspected coagulopathy, in addition to these having more than 3 comorbidities, high initial ferritin (>1000 ng/ml) and d-dimer levels as greater than 3600 U/ml were also predictive. The clinical pictures in the proven coagulopathy group included 5 myocardial infarctions, 4 disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), 2 deep vein thrombosis, 1 catheter-related venous thrombosis, 1 catheter-related venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism, 1 lower extremity arterial thrombosis, 1 stroke. All DIC cases had gram-negative bacterial sepsis. Conclusions : Our data suggest coagulopathy is not directly correlated with inflammation severity but patients in hyperinflamation phase should be pursued for possible proven coagulopathy.

Preliminary criteria for macrophage activation syndrome associated with coronavirus disease-19

Background: COVID-19 runs a severe disease associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in a subset of patients, and a hyperinflammatory response developing in the second week contributes to the worse outcome. Inflammatory features are mostly compatible with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) observed in other viral infections despite resulting in milder changes. Early detection and treatment of MAS may be associated with a better outcome. However, available criteria for MAS associated with other causes have not been helpful. Objectives: To identify distinct features of MAS associated with COVID-19 using a large database enabling to assess of dynamic changes. Methods: PCR-confirmed hospitalized COVID-19 patients followed between March and September 2020 constituted the discovery set. Patients considered to have findings of MAS by experienced physicians and given anakinra or tocilizumab were classified as the MAS group and the remaining patients as the non-MAS group. The MAS group was then re-grouped as the cases with exact-MAS and borderline-MAS cases by the study group. Clinical and laboratory data including the Ct values of the PCR test were obtained from the database, and dynamic changes were evaluated especially for the first 14 days of the hospitalization. The second set of 162 patients followed between September-December 2020 were used as the replication group to test the preliminary criteria. In the second set, hospitalization rules were changed, and all patients required oxygen support and received dexamethasone 6mg/day or equivalent glucocorticoids. Daily changes were calculated for the laboratory items in MAS, borderline, and non-MAS groups to see the days differentiating the groups, and ROC curves and lower and upper limits (10-90%) of the selected parameters were calculated to determine the cutoff values. Results: A total of 769 PCR-confirmed hospitalized patients were analysed, and 77 of them were classified as MAS and 83 as borderline MAS patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline viral loads of MAS patients compared to the non-MAS group according to the Ct values. Daily dynamic changes in the MAS group differed from the non-MAS group especially around the 6th day of hospitalization, and more than a twofold increase in ferritin and a 1.5-fold increase in D-dimer levels compared to the baseline values help to define the MAS group. Twelve items selected for the criteria are given in Table 1 below. The total score of 45 provided 79.6% sensitivity for the MAS (including borderline cases) and 81.3% specificity around days 5 and 6 in the discovery set, and a score of 60 increased the specificity to 94.9% despite a decrease in sensitivity to 40.8%. The same set provided a similar sensitivity (80.3%) in the replication, but a lower specificity (47.4-66% on days 6 to 9) due to a group of control patients with findings of MAS possibly masked by glucocorticoids. Conclusion: This study defined a set of preliminary criteria using the most relevant items of MAS according to the dynamic changes in the parameters in a group of COVID-19 patients. A score of 45 would be helpful to define a possible MAS group with reasonable sensitivity and specificity to start necessary treatments as early as possible.

Initial complete blood count score and predicting disease progression in COVID-19 patients

Introduction: Coronavirus has caused a pandemic since it was first detected in Wuhan in December 2019. The mortality rate is high in moderate and severe cases. Our study aimed to screen the CBC parameters as a useful predictive factor for COVID-19 resulting in critical illness. Methods: A total of 285 patients with positive PCR results were analyzed. The median age was 55 (24-90), and 64.2% of patients were male. Sixty-eight percent of cases were hospitalized with moderate, 32% with severe disease at initial admission. Results: We found that lymphocyte count <620/mcl, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >6, and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) >350 were predictive of the outcome. We scored our cohort 0-3 for these three parameters. Patients with a score of 2-3 were more likely to have progressive disease, anti-cytokine treatment, intensive care admission, intubation, and death, compared to patients with a score of 0-1. Additionally, they tended to be hospitalized for longer (median 11.5 days, mean 15.6), compared to those with a score 0 or 1 (median 9 days, mean 11.3). Twenty-eight of 38 cases with scores of 2-3 were discharged (73.6%), whereas the rate was 89% for patients with a score of 0-1 (P=0.009). Conclusion: Based on the absolute lymphocyte count (<620/mcl, NLR >6, PLR >350), our three-parameter score was able to predict disease progression, and the likelihood of anti-cytokine treatment, intubation, and death. We think that COVID-19 patients presenting with moderate to severe pneumonia, and having scores of 2 or 3 on our scale, should be closely monitored and robustly supported.